We will reveal the harm caused by weapons prohibited by the Geneva Convention to the environment of Ukraine, who and when will correct these consequences
Russia has repeatedly used phosphorus bombs in Ukraine: in the Sumy region, in Kharkiv, on Snake Island, and in many other places. The OSCE has already confirmed the use of prohibited weapons.
We remind you that phosphorous ammunition is a weapon that contains white phosphorus. Bombs are often filled with phosphorus, but this substance can also be used in mines, artillery shells, rockets, and grenades. It is a dangerous and deadly weapon for humans and the environment. The article describes its mechanism and what to do when the russians use phosphorus weapons.
Phosphorus has an extremely high combustion temperature of around 800°C, which sometimes varies depending on the type of ammunition, ambient temperature, and humidity. Such phosphorus leaves barely noticeable holes on clothes and charred organic tissues on the skin underneath; bones and even bone marrow can be damaged. In the case of inhalation of a heated mixture, the lungs are burned.
All this leads to severe and painful mutilation, and if phosphorus enters the body, it will cause a painful death. For humans, the lethal dose is 0.05–0.15 grams of phosphorus. A fatal case can occur even if phosphorus burns cover no more than 10% of a person's skin — death occurs due to hypocalcemia (leaching of calcium from the blood) 1-2 days after the event. Such cases were recorded in Vietnam after the phosphorus attacks.
That is why the additional protocols of 1977 to the Geneva Convention prohibit the use of phosphorus munitions, particularly those delivered by air, against military facilities in areas of concentration of the civilian population.
In the additional protocol to the Geneva Convention, it is no coincidence that it is mentioned that forests and other vegetation cannot be the target of an attack if they are not used to hide enemy forces or other military objectives because the use of heavy weapons in such an area leads to fires. In the case of phosphorus bombs, such fires become large-scale and difficult to extinguish. The incendiary mixture can spread over a large area, up to several hundred meters — depending on the ammunition filled with a dangerous substance. The perimeter of danger from the place of burning is approximately 800 meters – on average, within this radius from each explosion, people, animals, and plants can be poisoned or destroyed by the consequences of explosion and burning.
The use of phosphorus bombs leads to chemical soil pollution. Phosphorous compounds can remain in the ground for several years, and an excess of phosphates in the soil dramatically harms the growth and development of flora and fauna in the war zone. Falling into the ground, phosphorus combustion products and their solutions form salts. It increases the migration of phosphorus compounds from the affected area to areas free from hostilities.
Another danger factor is related to the fact that phosphorus does not change its properties for an indefinite period if it is in water or if other factors prevent sublimation. It means phosphorus particles accumulate in water bodies, swamps, wet soils, and snow. There are known cases when phosphorus was stored in the ground for more than 20 years without significant changes after explosions at the landfill. Even the water used for firefighting can have a toxic effect — when it gets back into the soil, sewage, and groundwater, it will poison them.
Eventually, the phosphorus accumulated in the water enters the bodies of mammals and birds. Phosphorus and the products of its interactions that enter drinking water sources cause phosphate poisoning, allergic reactions, and contact dermatitis. It is hazardous for waterfowl because of the accumulation and long-term storage capacity of phosphorus in the water. Joint studies by Finland, Denmark, the US, Norway, and Canada report deaths of ducks and swans, and fish-eating birds caused by the accumulation of phosphorus particles in their bodies.
In addition, after the territory has been bombarded with phosphorus weapons, dangerous substances from the burning of phosphorus in the form of smoke can settle on agricultural products — plant tissues undergo degradation, and leaves fade and turn yellow. Subsequently, products affected by phosphorus pose a threat to the person who will consume them.
It is not difficult to understand that the ammunition used for shelling is filled with phosphorus. The following characteristics will accompany any phosphorus shelling:
If you realize that you are in the zone affected by phosphorous projectiles, your next actions should be as follows:
The most common method of combating soil contamination is the "earthworks method": contaminated soil is removed by an excavator and transported to a special site that permits handling contaminated soil.
It is a practical and effective solution in places with a very concentrated amount of contaminated material. In the USA, this method of cleaning the environment from war pollutants is used at training grounds where military exercises were conducted.
Such earthworks are often a simple, reliable, and quick solution, but there are also certain difficulties here:
Conclusion: the procedure has certain disadvantages. It is logical. Thus, the environmental monitoring expert Maksym Soroka, whom we consulted, confirms: that what works perfectly in laboratory conditions and looks brilliant in theory may not be viable in reality.
Of course, the ingress of phosphorus into soils due to military operations changes their acidity and poisons them. But Maksym Soroka notes: that you shouldn't paint the worst scenarios and become "heralds of the apocalypse":
"Open the standards for applying mineral fertilizers, the permitted amount of phosphorus fertilizers, and convert this mass into phosphorus. And you will be so surprised that, it turns out, we introduce a large amount of phosphorus into the soil anyway. Of course, the soil needs phosphorus, just not in such quantities and not so concentrated. "For many years of using very different mineral fertilizers, agronomists have learned where to add what. There are appropriate technical solutions, where to add which minerals," comments the ecologist.
So, for now, while the war continues, farmers continue to cultivate the fields and regulate the chemical content. But what to do with war consequences in the future, we have to decide after the end of the war:
"We have the experience we had in Syria, Iran — these are small projects done with crazy money from the UN or the Red Cross. They often like to mention the example of the Balkans. Let me remind you: this process started after the war ended, research was done and, based on these researches, reconstruction was already planned. For some reason, everyone who analyzes this experience is silent about this. So far, in the best case, demining will take place, at least metal will also be removed, and farmers will take care of their lands," says the expert.
Тисячі українців, як військових, так і цивільних, приносять додому гільзи, патрони, гранати, частини снарядів і… Читати більше
Рішення для розбудови комьюніті, комфортних міст, українського підприємництва та інклюзивності суспільства. Читати більше
Rubryka visited the shores of the Kakhovka Reservoir to explore how the Kushugumska community has… Читати більше
Перетворити власний травматичний досвід спочатку на текст п’єси, а потім поставити її на сцені —… Читати більше
Безпека як основний вектор для трансформацій міської інфраструктури Читати більше
On September 4, Russian forces launched a drone and missile attack on Lviv, resulting in… Читати більше
Цей сайт використовує Cookies.