Environmentalists from the organization Environment.People.Law published a scientific study collecting methods of restoring the environment polluted and destroyed after the war. It costs billions, but we can expect to be reimbursed.
The war continues, and the russians commit war crimes, including against Ukraine's environment, daily. It is water and soil pollution caused by the release of chemicals from explosions. For example, the sulfur in the ammo rounds burns all living things—plants, microorganisms, insects, etc. Heavy metals are stored in the ground and later enter our diet together with products.
The destruction of strategic facilities can also cause such pollution. For example, the damage to sewage treatment plants can lead to sewage leakage into rivers. As a result, the spread of diseases, perhaps even epidemics, and the worsening of the epidemiological situation are possible because of the ingress of dangerous substances into drinking water or later into food products.
Also, in places of intense fighting, the spawning of fish is significantly disturbed, and the nesting places of birds are destroyed due to loud explosions (ammunition often explodes in the water reservoirs). The state of wetland ecosystems is negatively affected by crossing rivers with floating armored personnel carriers and the construction of pontoon crossings for other vehicles.
After all, fires in warehouses, oil depots, and shopping centers hit by russian shells with the burning of chemical reagents lead not only to short-term air pollution. Thus, dangerous ash, containing carcinogenic compounds harmful to living organisms, is repeatedly released into the atmosphere every time the wind blows; with water, this ash enters the soil.
Areas affected by hostilities can still be restored and even improved and subsequently given recreational status or re-used for industry or agriculture. There are already examples of such use worldwide; moreover, there are examples of environmental restoration after ecological disasters, even in Ukraine.
Environmentalists from the organization Environment.People.Law developed a study devoted to the methods of restoring the environment after hostilities. What do the experts suggest to do? We analyze each of the solutions.
One solution is conservation and restrictions on land use. It was done, for example, on Bikini Atoll (Marshall Islands). Once an American nuclear test site, Bikini Atoll is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Although this territory does not have official protected status, there are certain restrictions on using environmental resources to preserve and restore biodiversity.
Nature-based solutions are used when it's impossible to conserve the land continuously or continue to use it for agricultural purposes in territories affected by military actions. It works, for example, if you turn explosion craters into "islands" of forests and dugout ponds. Sometimes they even form independently. Rubryka and ecologists visited the Chernihiv region to collect soil samples from areas of land with consequences of artillery shelling.
To our surprise, it was impossible to take samples for analysis in some places because the holes had already turned into lakes.
Environmentalists are convinced that the damaged topography of the field can be transformed into a new valuable landscape for agriculture that will be more sustainable and productive in the not-too-distant future. The solution is "natural islands" at the sites of explosions.
Accordingly, the modified agricultural landscape will help the agricultural producer or farmer because it can:
As for the destruction of infrastructure by the russians, there is also a solution. Environmentalists give the example of the Oskil reservoir dam, the largest on the left bank of the Dnieper, which was destroyed on April 2, and give an unexpected conclusion: there is no need to restore the damaged part of the dam. It is better to demolish the entire barrier to restore the flow of the Oskil River. Environmentalists give the following explanation:
"As a result of the hostilities, leading to the destruction of industrial enterprises, there is no longer any sense in taking such a quantity of water. Based on this, the main purpose of the mentioned reservoir was to accumulate water to maintain the level of the Donets, most of which was taken to the Siverskyi Donets–Donbas canal. Now the purpose disappeared," says the study.
It will give several advantages at once:
So there are solutions that we can implement through the intelligent management of natural resources—we can do this by implementing the reforms proposed by ecologists and investing funds in relevant projects. By the way, we will undoubtedly receive compensation for the damage caused by russia through international courts after our victory.
Let's believe in victory and take care of nature together with EcoRubric!
This award recognized Ukrainian civil society's “courageous activities during the war” The 12th Global Assembly… Читати більше
Serhii Kalitsun is a native of the Vasylkiv community in the Kyiv region. He lost… Читати більше
Розбираємо, про що йдеться у законопроєкті про поступове підвищення акцизу на тютюнові вироби до 2028… Читати більше
“Алексу” 52. Восени 2024-го він втратив руку в боях у Вовчанську. Але сама ця історія… Читати більше
38-річний Сергій Малечко родом із Чернігівської області. З перших днів повномасштабного вторгнення добровольцем боронив Україну.… Читати більше
Rubryka highlights an initiative that bridges generations in every sense—both emotionally and digitally. Читати більше
Цей сайт використовує Cookies.